|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
5mok1ng gun
Moon Of The Pheonix
4
   |
Posted - 2015.02.27 16:31:16 -
[1] - Quote
Gilbaron wrote:can't you disallow fighter assist from within 50km of a tower instead ? that's gonna produce some lovely killmails
removing fighter warp is completely unnessecarry
Totally agree removing fighter warp is completely unnecessary, I would go further with disallowing fighter assist within 400k of a towers shield ( so an attacker can shoot the parent ship without problems from the tower ).
Axloth Okiah wrote:How about keeping their ability to warp but making them pointable?
I'm all for pointing fighters and stopping them being recalled.
Better still to stop the named "sky net" style just stop them from being assigned to anything below a cruiser, I would also like to bring up the fact that carrier hull bonuses to fighters are not applied to assigned fighters but the modules that augment drone stats ARE passed down to assigned fighters, This needs to be changed before attacking assigning fighters, Fighter warping and so on.
Step 1. Remove drone module pass down to ships receiving assigned fighters.
Step 2. Restrict fighter assignment to cruisers and above.
Step 3. Allow fighters to be scrambled / Disrupted so they don't warp off.
Step 4. Restrict carriers from assigning fighters within range of a POS an ideal range would be 110k so the carrier can't warp to the POS or at least that's the least range I would want to see.
Leave fighter warping and assignment alone, The problem is with questionable skilled players finding these carriers and killing them, Who knows people that regularly PVP in low / null sec might actually scan something down to kill instead of warping to zero on the best sites to snag an easy one. |
5mok1ng gun
Moon Of The Pheonix
4
|
Posted - 2015.02.27 18:22:29 -
[2] - Quote
Ivan Stoner wrote:I think its a difficult decision which CCP has to take.
Because:
- a Carrier isnt a frontline ship
- the fighters or fighter bombers doing all the work not the ship itself
on the other side i saw how Brave use the Skynet tactic on the receiving end and yeah its annoying. You lost ship but you cant catch the ceptor and if you warp to the carrier POS hes all ready inside or he puts the password in.
My opinion is that CCP should only allow Fighter assist only for min. Cruisers or BC and or above. Fighter Bomber assist only to BS and above. They also should limit the Fighter/Fighter Bomber assist to max 5 per assistet ship.
From what i recall fighter bombers can't be assigned to another ship and it should stay that way. |
5mok1ng gun
Moon Of The Pheonix
4
|
Posted - 2015.03.01 14:43:28 -
[3] - Quote
octahexx Charante wrote:this game keeps getting nerfed,it gets duller for ever forced gameplay style,cattleprodding the player base into the next playstyle to then nerf it,the game gets smaller and more dull for every removal of personal choice,nerfing the capitals and supers that is the current trend removes endgame,everytime a doctrine shows to be effective because its the least nerfed ship it gets nerfed.
i cant put the words for it down but it makes the world of eve online smaller and less exciting,i dont want all the ships to be the same and nerfed into a childsafe yellow bumpercar with foampadding...
EVE has been getting nerfed more and more into the child safe environment you know it as now.
BS's get webbed to hell target painted and blaped by dreads so capital guns get a nerf because them getting blaped are not moving, nothing to do with the dread but the utility people use to achieve the blap and the stupidity of the blaped doesn't realise the MWD they are still trying to use is making the BS the size of a small moon.
Now fighters are warping after people and killing them or just killing them you bashed the scan res of them CCP to make them take longer to lock the smaller targets and now ( you have decided in your extensive 1 month ish of new data ) that the problem is now with assignment or warping of fighters.
Fighters are supposed to be a powerful weapon ( what other weapons do carriers have ? ) and now you want to screw over the usability of them by taking away assignment and / or warping after targets with what little data you have acquired since the last change you did to fighters.
You had more long term information on Ishtar trends than you have on the fighter trends since their respective changes but to hell with data right lets just keep bashing capitals because "ENTER REASONS" or "ENTER NOOB COMPLAINTS"
WAHHH capitals are so hard to kill
WAHHH scanning capitals is such a chore
WAHHH ...................
WAHHH ..............................
WAHHH ......................................
|
5mok1ng gun
Moon Of The Pheonix
8
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 01:46:40 -
[4] - Quote
My toilet looks better than this nerf and I just took the biggest dump of my life.
Nothing else needs saying as it appears the decision has been made and you have all been ignored as I suspected you would be but hay keep bashing your head against the wall it may give.
It may give one day... |
|
|
| |
|